Look back at your answers to your homework that was assigned on April 30, The U.S. struggles against the Communist in Vietnam.
Handout: Case Study 3: The Vietnam War
Why did the USA lose the Vietnam War?
The Americans did not lose purely for military reasons. There were other factors as well.
Write an explanation AND cite a source which shows the importance of the following six factors:
1. US military tactics in Vietnam (Source 36-Viet Cong tunnel complex)
The US military couldn't fight against the guerilla warfare style of the Veit Cong. The weren't used to how the Viet Cong didn't wear uniforms and made surprise attack. This was a big challenge for the US military because they usually fought in fields and didn't have to figure out who was a soldier and who was an innocent civilian (which led to many civilian deaths). Also, the US was drafting young, inexperienced soldiers who didn't know how to fight, especially against the Viet Cong.
2. The unpopularity of the South Vietnamese regime (Sources 41, 47)
Many Vietnamese people supported the communist Viet Cong just because they didn't want to support the Southern Vietnamese.
3. The experience of the Viet Cong and the inexperience of the American soldiers (source 37)
The American soldiers were drafted, young and inexperienced. Many of them didn't want to be fighting, and were not motivated at all. Some people in America were supporting the war because they believed in the Domino effect and that if Vietnam fell to communism, many other countries would. But the soldiers didn't necessarily believe this. Once soldiers became experienced (after a year), they were replaced with more inexperienced, drafted soldiers. The Viet Cong were very motivated because the Americans were invading their land and killing their people.
4. Domestic opposition to the war in the U.S. (Source 51)
Since this was the first televised war in the US, and the people were seeing exactly what was happening in Vietnam, they were against it. They saw that the effort to contain communism wasn't working, and they turned against it.
5. Chinese and Soviet support for the Viet Cong (Source 38)
China and the USSR were supplying the Viet Cong with weapons, which was a big advantage for them.
6. 'But did they really lose?' Summarize the argument put forward in Source 57, and your view on it.
Source 57 says that the Americans never really lost because they technically weren't defeated in a battle. The US was not present in Vietnam when the capital of South Vietnam fell to the Viet Cong. This was two years after the US military had left Vietnam. I agree with this source because the US didn't really fight and lose a war in Vietnam, they we're trying to stop the spread of communism and then decided it wasn't working so stopped fighting it.
Showing posts with label Vietnam_War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vietnam_War. Show all posts
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Vietnam War Opposition
Using your knowledge gained from previous readings in the Vietnam War reading, complete the following.
You are an opponent of American involvement in Vietnam. Use the evidence in this chapter to begin formulating ideas to make a poster or a leaflet putting forward your views. You can include stories and images from pages 353-61. However, you must also include an explanation that will convince the supporters of containment that the policy is not working in Vietnam. OPTIONAL: Instead of opposing the war, you can support it. Feel free to make a COUNTER-ARGUMENT that the war is necessary to contain Communism.
1. Note all of the reasons why you feel the war in Vietnam is wrong.
-Drafting young inexperienced American soldiers is not helping the war effort. It is basically drafting them and most of them get killed within the first couple of months. The ones who survive and become experienced are soon replaced with more inexperienced soldiers.
-American soldiers are killing many Vietnamese civilians since they do not know for sure if they are involved with the Viet cong and prefer not to take chances. This is extremely harsh and violent. Evidence of this was the My Lai massacre, where the US soldiers killed a whole town because they were suspected to be working for the Viet cong.
-Obviously the attempt at containing communism is not working. Evidence of this is the Tet Offensive, where even after the US sent money and soldiers to Vietnam, the Viet cong was still able to organize a large offensive against the US embassy.
-The US was spending a lot of money on the war and it wasn't worth it.
-The Americans directly saw what was going on in Vietnam because it was the first televised war. People saw the harsh reality right in their homes.
2. Note what you are trying to achieve with this poster. (e.g. to convince people to write to their Congressmen to get the troops out.)
Pointing out all of the reasons the war is wrong should show readers that this is a war we do not want to be involved with anymore. I want to spread the unpopularity of the war because the more people against it, the more protest and hopefully actions will be made to stop the war.
3. List possible images for your poster. Think about: background (e.g. destroyed villages); the central image (e.g. picture of a young soldier); whether you will need words to explain your image.
I think it would be effective to show scenes of destroyed villages with an explanation of an event such as the My Lai massacre to educate people about the specifics if they didn't already know. Showing an image of a young soldier who has been wounded while fighting would show that they are drafting inexperienced young men who are not ready for this kind of war. I think the fewer words the better because visual posters appeal more to people than blocks of text. Pictures with short captions/explanations/overviews are the most effective.
4. List some possible slogans for your poster.
"Stop Involvement in Vietnam"
"No More Unnecessary Violence"
Headline: We are fighting for containment, not aiming to kill many innocent civilians.
You are an opponent of American involvement in Vietnam. Use the evidence in this chapter to begin formulating ideas to make a poster or a leaflet putting forward your views. You can include stories and images from pages 353-61. However, you must also include an explanation that will convince the supporters of containment that the policy is not working in Vietnam. OPTIONAL: Instead of opposing the war, you can support it. Feel free to make a COUNTER-ARGUMENT that the war is necessary to contain Communism.
1. Note all of the reasons why you feel the war in Vietnam is wrong.
-Drafting young inexperienced American soldiers is not helping the war effort. It is basically drafting them and most of them get killed within the first couple of months. The ones who survive and become experienced are soon replaced with more inexperienced soldiers.
-American soldiers are killing many Vietnamese civilians since they do not know for sure if they are involved with the Viet cong and prefer not to take chances. This is extremely harsh and violent. Evidence of this was the My Lai massacre, where the US soldiers killed a whole town because they were suspected to be working for the Viet cong.
-Obviously the attempt at containing communism is not working. Evidence of this is the Tet Offensive, where even after the US sent money and soldiers to Vietnam, the Viet cong was still able to organize a large offensive against the US embassy.
-The US was spending a lot of money on the war and it wasn't worth it.
-The Americans directly saw what was going on in Vietnam because it was the first televised war. People saw the harsh reality right in their homes.
2. Note what you are trying to achieve with this poster. (e.g. to convince people to write to their Congressmen to get the troops out.)
Pointing out all of the reasons the war is wrong should show readers that this is a war we do not want to be involved with anymore. I want to spread the unpopularity of the war because the more people against it, the more protest and hopefully actions will be made to stop the war.
3. List possible images for your poster. Think about: background (e.g. destroyed villages); the central image (e.g. picture of a young soldier); whether you will need words to explain your image.
I think it would be effective to show scenes of destroyed villages with an explanation of an event such as the My Lai massacre to educate people about the specifics if they didn't already know. Showing an image of a young soldier who has been wounded while fighting would show that they are drafting inexperienced young men who are not ready for this kind of war. I think the fewer words the better because visual posters appeal more to people than blocks of text. Pictures with short captions/explanations/overviews are the most effective.
4. List some possible slogans for your poster.
"Stop Involvement in Vietnam"
"No More Unnecessary Violence"
Headline: We are fighting for containment, not aiming to kill many innocent civilians.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Vietnam War Turning Points
Using your knowledge gained from previous readings in the Vietnam War reading, answer the following questions.
1. Why was the Tet Offensive a turning point? Explain your answer.
The Tet Offensive was a turning point in the war because it put things into perspective for the United States. They started to think about how the Vietcong communists could have been able to launch a major offensive that took them completely by surprise if the US had put so much money and so many soldiers into Vietnam. The war in Vietnam was not that popular to begin with, and this event really turned Americans against it.
2. Are Sources 51 and 52 making the same point about the My Lai Massacre?
I think they are not making the same point.
I think Source 51 is focusing on the side of the issue that deals with moral choices and what is humane. This source is making the point that what the US soldiers did in My Lai was wrong. He compared them to Nazi's since they were just slaughtering whole villages, and obviously the American soldiers didn't go there to to that. They went their to get rid of communism, but this is what they ended up doing.
Source 52 is saying that they weren't there to kill people, they were there to destroy communism. This source implies that to destroy communism, people must be killed and there is nothing wrong with that.
3. Why do you think it took 12 months for anyone to do anything about the massacre?
I think it took 12 months for someone to do something about the massacre because they wanted to let the issue settle for a while. If someone had said something too soon they might not have gotten the response they were looking for- an investigation.
4. Why was the massacre so shocking to the American public?
It was really clear now to the Americans that this was not right. There were so many civilians being killed for no reason other than that they "might" be involved with the Viet Cong. The American troops seemed to be straying from the goal of getting rid of communism, and instead, they were just being really violent.
1. Why was the Tet Offensive a turning point? Explain your answer.
The Tet Offensive was a turning point in the war because it put things into perspective for the United States. They started to think about how the Vietcong communists could have been able to launch a major offensive that took them completely by surprise if the US had put so much money and so many soldiers into Vietnam. The war in Vietnam was not that popular to begin with, and this event really turned Americans against it.
2. Are Sources 51 and 52 making the same point about the My Lai Massacre?
I think they are not making the same point.
I think Source 51 is focusing on the side of the issue that deals with moral choices and what is humane. This source is making the point that what the US soldiers did in My Lai was wrong. He compared them to Nazi's since they were just slaughtering whole villages, and obviously the American soldiers didn't go there to to that. They went their to get rid of communism, but this is what they ended up doing.
Source 52 is saying that they weren't there to kill people, they were there to destroy communism. This source implies that to destroy communism, people must be killed and there is nothing wrong with that.
3. Why do you think it took 12 months for anyone to do anything about the massacre?
I think it took 12 months for someone to do something about the massacre because they wanted to let the issue settle for a while. If someone had said something too soon they might not have gotten the response they were looking for- an investigation.
4. Why was the massacre so shocking to the American public?
It was really clear now to the Americans that this was not right. There were so many civilians being killed for no reason other than that they "might" be involved with the Viet Cong. The American troops seemed to be straying from the goal of getting rid of communism, and instead, they were just being really violent.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
The U.S. struggles against the Communist in Vietnam
You are to read pages 356-61 in your Vietnam War reading. Then, using the chart that was given to you in class, complete the following assignment. You are to copy and paste only questions 1 a - 1 b. & 2 a. - 2 h. to your blog.
Why was the US army unable to defeat the Communists in Vietnam?
Step 1: Gathering the evidence-fill out chart
Step 2: Using pages 356-61 in the Vietnam War Reading, make notes in columns 2 (US Army) and 4 (Viet Cong) to record how far each side had each quality.
Step 3: in each row of column 3, draw some scales to show which way the balance falls for this quality. Did the USA or the Viet Cong have the advantage?
1. Now think about the overall picture - how the strengths and weaknesses work together.
a) Were the armies finely balanced or was the balance strongly weighted to one side or the other?
The Viet Cong seemed to have the advantage in these areas: many good, committed soldiers, effective war tactics and support from the Vietnamese. The US had the advantage with technology, and supplies and equipment.
b) Which quality was most important in determining who won the war? Was one feature so important that being ahead in that area meant that other advantages or disadvantages did not matter?
I think that the fact that the Viet Cong had such advanced war tactics meant that they would win. The Guerilla warfare tired the US troops out. The Viet Cong had the advantage of knowing the territory and could use it as a means to get ahead in war.
Stage 3: Explaining your conclusions
The failure of the U.S. army to beat the Communists in Vietnam was the result of its own weaknesses and Viet Cong strengths.
2. Now write up your answer:
a. The U.S. weaknesses were that they weren't popular among the Vietnamese population. The soldiers were drafted, young, inexperienced and not motivated.
b. At the same time, the Communist strengths were that they were fighting Guerilla warfare which was an advantage over the Americans who didn't know the land. They also has many soldiers that could replace casualties. They had Vietnamese support.
c. The U.S. forces did have some successes. For example, they bombed the Ho Chi Minh trail that carried supplies to the Viet Cong. The Operation Rolling Thunder bombing was successful, the US bombed military and industrial targets in North Vietnam. They had chemical weapons that worked well but killed many civilians.
d. However, there were some major US failures as well. Examples of these were search and destroy missions were not effective because they killed many civilians. The US troops got caught in traps frequently, and they lost support from the Vietnamese population.
e. The Viet Cong had some major successes, such as Guerrilla warfare. They had a major advantage over the US inexperienced soldiers.
f. However, the Viet Cong also suffered defeats, for example the Tet offensive. The attacked many south Vietnam cities and the US embassy on the same day and lost many experienced fighters.
g. If I had to identify one major American weakness, it would be that the soldiers were young and inexperienced because this hurt them a lot. They drafted young men who frequently tried to avoid the draft by moving to canada. The Viet Cong had many experienced fighters that were extremely motivated.
h. The key Viet Cong strength was the Guerilla warfare because they were more effective fighters.
Why was the US army unable to defeat the Communists in Vietnam?
Step 1: Gathering the evidence-fill out chart
Step 2: Using pages 356-61 in the Vietnam War Reading, make notes in columns 2 (US Army) and 4 (Viet Cong) to record how far each side had each quality.
Step 3: in each row of column 3, draw some scales to show which way the balance falls for this quality. Did the USA or the Viet Cong have the advantage?
1. Now think about the overall picture - how the strengths and weaknesses work together.
a) Were the armies finely balanced or was the balance strongly weighted to one side or the other?
The Viet Cong seemed to have the advantage in these areas: many good, committed soldiers, effective war tactics and support from the Vietnamese. The US had the advantage with technology, and supplies and equipment.
b) Which quality was most important in determining who won the war? Was one feature so important that being ahead in that area meant that other advantages or disadvantages did not matter?
I think that the fact that the Viet Cong had such advanced war tactics meant that they would win. The Guerilla warfare tired the US troops out. The Viet Cong had the advantage of knowing the territory and could use it as a means to get ahead in war.
Stage 3: Explaining your conclusions
The failure of the U.S. army to beat the Communists in Vietnam was the result of its own weaknesses and Viet Cong strengths.
2. Now write up your answer:
a. The U.S. weaknesses were that they weren't popular among the Vietnamese population. The soldiers were drafted, young, inexperienced and not motivated.
b. At the same time, the Communist strengths were that they were fighting Guerilla warfare which was an advantage over the Americans who didn't know the land. They also has many soldiers that could replace casualties. They had Vietnamese support.
c. The U.S. forces did have some successes. For example, they bombed the Ho Chi Minh trail that carried supplies to the Viet Cong. The Operation Rolling Thunder bombing was successful, the US bombed military and industrial targets in North Vietnam. They had chemical weapons that worked well but killed many civilians.
d. However, there were some major US failures as well. Examples of these were search and destroy missions were not effective because they killed many civilians. The US troops got caught in traps frequently, and they lost support from the Vietnamese population.
e. The Viet Cong had some major successes, such as Guerrilla warfare. They had a major advantage over the US inexperienced soldiers.
f. However, the Viet Cong also suffered defeats, for example the Tet offensive. The attacked many south Vietnam cities and the US embassy on the same day and lost many experienced fighters.
g. If I had to identify one major American weakness, it would be that the soldiers were young and inexperienced because this hurt them a lot. They drafted young men who frequently tried to avoid the draft by moving to canada. The Viet Cong had many experienced fighters that were extremely motivated.
h. The key Viet Cong strength was the Guerilla warfare because they were more effective fighters.
Thursday, April 29, 2010
The U.S. Enters the Vietnam War
In your Cold War file folder in your Google Docs account, read pages 353 to 355 of Vietnam War.
1. Many neutral observers in Vietnam were critical of US policy. Explain why.
Since the Americans were afraid of a communist plan to dominate all of South east Asia, they gave $500 million a year into the French war effort and helped the French to set up a non-communist government in the south of the country. This war lasted from 1946 to 1954. After the war, the country was split into North and South Vietnam until elections could be held. The USA made a rule that prevented the elections from taking place because it feared that Communists would win. They viewed Vietnam as the first domino in a long line of countries that would fall to communism, and the US had to prevent this.
The US supported leaders as long as they were anti-communist, even if the governments were corrupt (which they were). This increased support of communist parties.
2. Explain how US politicians would have defended their policies.
The US politicians viewed it as stopping the spread of communism, and they would do anything it would take to do this.
3. The following events are not listed in correct date order. Place them in the correct chronological order.Then note the reason for each U.S. action, and how it brought the U.S. into deeper involvement in Vietnam.
The reasons you can choose from are: No direct involvement; financial support; political involvement; military involvement. Also, note what events triggered the increased involvement.
(1965) U.S. Marines land at Da Nang (military)
(1955) U.S. stops elections in Vietnam (political)
(1954) Formation of South Vietnam (political involvement)
(1960s) Viet Cong attacks on U.S. and South Vietnam bases (military)
(1960) Viet Cong formed (military)
(1962) Number of 'advisers' reaches over 11,500 (military involvement)
(1962) JFK sends military advisers (military involvement)
(1963) Assassination of JFK - Johnson becomes president
(1963) U.S. supports South Vietnam government after army overthrow Diem (financial, political)
(1964) Gulf of Tonkin Incident (military involvement)
4. Choose two events that you think were critical in getting the U.S. involved in a war in Vietnam. Explain
your choice.
Assassinations of JFK-This was really important because in the middle of this situation that the US is in, the president is assassinated and there is a new one, which changes everything. JFK believed in a more peaceful approach to conflicts, and Johnson didn't think this way at all.
I think when JFK sends military "advisers" to fight the Viet Cong is significant because it increased tension between north and south vietnam and American involvement was really large.
1. Many neutral observers in Vietnam were critical of US policy. Explain why.
Since the Americans were afraid of a communist plan to dominate all of South east Asia, they gave $500 million a year into the French war effort and helped the French to set up a non-communist government in the south of the country. This war lasted from 1946 to 1954. After the war, the country was split into North and South Vietnam until elections could be held. The USA made a rule that prevented the elections from taking place because it feared that Communists would win. They viewed Vietnam as the first domino in a long line of countries that would fall to communism, and the US had to prevent this.
The US supported leaders as long as they were anti-communist, even if the governments were corrupt (which they were). This increased support of communist parties.
2. Explain how US politicians would have defended their policies.
The US politicians viewed it as stopping the spread of communism, and they would do anything it would take to do this.
3. The following events are not listed in correct date order. Place them in the correct chronological order.Then note the reason for each U.S. action, and how it brought the U.S. into deeper involvement in Vietnam.
The reasons you can choose from are: No direct involvement; financial support; political involvement; military involvement. Also, note what events triggered the increased involvement.
(1965) U.S. Marines land at Da Nang (military)
(1955) U.S. stops elections in Vietnam (political)
(1954) Formation of South Vietnam (political involvement)
(1960s) Viet Cong attacks on U.S. and South Vietnam bases (military)
(1960) Viet Cong formed (military)
(1962) Number of 'advisers' reaches over 11,500 (military involvement)
(1962) JFK sends military advisers (military involvement)
(1963) Assassination of JFK - Johnson becomes president
(1963) U.S. supports South Vietnam government after army overthrow Diem (financial, political)
(1964) Gulf of Tonkin Incident (military involvement)
4. Choose two events that you think were critical in getting the U.S. involved in a war in Vietnam. Explain
your choice.
Assassinations of JFK-This was really important because in the middle of this situation that the US is in, the president is assassinated and there is a new one, which changes everything. JFK believed in a more peaceful approach to conflicts, and Johnson didn't think this way at all.
I think when JFK sends military "advisers" to fight the Viet Cong is significant because it increased tension between north and south vietnam and American involvement was really large.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)